ad

Viacom, YouTube inch towards courtroom showdown

Viacom, YouTube inch towards courtroom showdown
by Greg Sandoval

* Font size
* Print
* E-mail
* Share
* 1 comment
* Yahoo! Buzz

Share

Google and Viacom are preparing to throw legal blows at each other as
part of Viacom's $1 billion copyright lawsuit against YouTube,
according to documents filed with a federal court last month.

Both parties have requested a meeting with the judge to discuss the
individual motions for summary judgment that each plans to file. In
summary judgment, a court decides enough evidence exists for for him
or her to rule without sending the case to trial.

Google CEO Eric Schmidt
(Credit: Greg Sandoval/CNET )

Viacom accuses YouTube of encouraging copyright and profiting when
users upload unauthorized TV and movie clips. That the two sides are
preparing for summary judgment is a sign that the nearly 3-year-old
and closely-watched copyright fight is finally nearing some kind of
closure.

Legal experts have said they expect some kind of resolution sometime
the year. However the case is decided could set an important precedent
for Web video and music services.

In their letters, each company claims that the evidence proves their cases.

Google argues in its letter to U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton that
YouTube is protected by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA),
which protects Internet service providers from being held responsible
for copyright violations committed by users. To support the claim,
Google cited a previous decision in the copyright suit filed by
Universal Music Group against video site Veoh .

Viacom told Stanton that the company identified 63,000 unauthorized
clips taken from 3,000 of its films and TV shows on YouTube. Viacom
claims YouTube is not protected by the DMCA and said its case is
supported by recent Supreme Court decisions.

All Things Digital, which broke the news about the recent legal
filings, also noted that the judge redacted much of the information in
Viacom's letter. Many of the documents in the case have been sealed,
meaning the public is not supposed to have access. CNET was able to
obtain some of the sealed documents and you can read about them here
and here.